Dear Friend,
Welcome to
November -- a month of voting, veterans and
Thanksgiving! In this e-newsletter there are some
time-sensitive items for you to consider, so please take
a minute to follow the information below.
As always, if I can ever be of assistance please
don’t hesitate to contact me. Have a good week and
remember that Wednesday, the 11th, is Veterans' Day. If you
haven’t already done so, please thank a veteran for
his or her service and sacrifice.
Sincerely, Jaime
Herrera State Representative (360) 687-0489
P.S. -- If
you know of anyone who would like to sign up for my
e-newsletter, please let them know they can do so by
visiting this
link. Thanks!
Calling all employers and employees!
No one has to be reminded of the state of our
economy. I'm working on several proposals for the
Legislature to consider when we reconvene in January to
combat the rising costs of doing business and its affect
on
local
unemployment,
and to help put people back to work. With this e-newsletter, however, I must ask you
to weigh in as well.
If you are an
employer or employee, you will likely be affected by a
proposed workers’ compensation premium rate increase
of 7.6 percent for 2010. You can
read more about it
here.
Sounds okay at first reading, right?
Here are some facts, according to state Department of
Labor and Industries (L&I) data:
- the proposed rate hike equates to $117 million
in new costs for employers;
- workers' compensation claims have declined 55
percent since 1990, yet rates are more than 50
percent
higher than ten years ago; and
- administrative costs for the state's system are
up 28 percent over the last year.
While employers are doing their part by providing
successful worker safety programs and reducing claims,
the state refuses to address rampant fraud in the
system. This drives up costs for employers and honest
employees. Employers are making tough decisions every
day to trim costs, and L&I should be doing the same.
While workers’ compensation
premiums are falling around the
country, our state is choosing to make it harder for
small and family businesses to operate by increasing
premiums. When their doors close, it means fewer job
opportunities in our communities.
Now is not a
time to add to the cost of doing business in Washington.
Let’s protect jobs and urge rejection of this increase.
The 2010 workers' compensation premium rate will be adopted by
Nov. 30. Employers and those affected can submit their
views until Nov. 7. Written comments can be e-mailed to
Ronald Moore, Employer Services Program Manager, at
MOOA235@lni.wa.gov. Comments can also be mailed to Moore
at the Department of Labor and Industries, P.O.
Box 44140, Olympia, WA 98504-4140. Faxed comments can be
sent to (360) 902-4729.
Bonneville Power Administration transmission line
activities
The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) has
proposed building a new transmission line
from Troutdale, Oregon to Castle Rock. The BPA
is studying dozens of proposed routes and is holding
open-house meetings around the area. I attended one
Tuesday in Camas and came away with some concerns.
I believe it is important we add
transmission capacity and keep our power grid stable so
that we can all continue to count on our electricity --
even when demand is at its highest. However, I will
continue to urge the BPA to approach any potential new
transmission lines with concern for the folks who live
nearby and to utilize existing rights-of-way. Most of
all, the process needs to be fair for
the affected property owners -- especially those whose
homes are close to potential transmission lines.
Click on the map below to view the BPA's I-5 Corridor Reinforcement Project
Study Area.

I have already been contacted by a number of
residents in North and East Clark County and East
Cowlitz County who have received a letter from the BPA
requesting (or in some minds, demanding) access to their
land for survey purposes. If you have received such a
letter, it is very important that you provide
the BPA with your thoughts and concerns. If you
have not already attended an open-house meeting, I
encourage you to attend the remaining one (see below).
Saturday, Nov. 7
1 to 4 p.m. Hazel Dell Grange 7509 NE Hazel Dell
Avenue Vancouver, WA 98665
Public comments are being accepted until
Nov. 23. You can comment at the BPA’s Web
site, mail them a letter, call, or fax using toll-free
lines. Please see below.
http://www.bpa.gov/corporate/i-5-eis/ecomment.cfm
I-5 Corridor Reinforcement Project, P.O. Box 9250,
Portland, OR 97207 Phone: 1-800-230-6593 FAX:
1-800-315-4503
Health care: How proposals in Congress could affect
health care for seniors in Southwest Washington
It seems like we cannot pick up a newspaper or watch
the news without hearing about health care proposals in
Congress. As a state representative on the Health Care
and Wellness Committee, I am watching closely to how
these proposals would affect us here in Southwest
Washington. What I am seeing out of the other Washington
is troublesome, especially the impacts it could have on
many seniors.
Let me set the stage. It appears
the final bill would create a massive expansion of
government health insurance that is paid for in large
part by "savings" from Medicare -– the government health
insurance program for seniors. But please make no
mistake: in this instance, savings means cuts.
And more troubling is the fact Medicare is already
paying out more in benefits than it will be able to
sustain -– and most of the baby boomers have not even
retired yet.
So how might all this impact you or
your family? The main target of proposed cuts is
Medicare Advantage (MA) plans – which 209,878
Washingtonians, or 23.4 percent of Medicare recipients,
have chosen as their Medicare plan.
If you are
not familiar with MA plans, they provide options for
seniors on Medicare. Instead of traditional
fee-for-service Medicare, seniors may select an MA plan
that is administered by a private health insurer to
receive their Medicare coverage. This includes Parts A,
B, Medigap, and many include prescription drug coverage.
The point is that seniors are free to choose
what best meets their needs. By eliminating MA plans,
the federal government would be eliminating
choice for many seniors.
Many seniors
prefer MA plans because they provide broader and richer
benefits, coordinated care, and access to physicians and
specialists. Perhaps as you may have experienced, many
physicians and specialists will not see traditional
Medicare patients due to the low reimbursement rates.
This is not the norm with MA plans. They often provide
better payments to physicians.
If you are a
senior in Southwest Washington and have an MA plan,
you’ve got a fighting chance at finding a physician
willing to take on a new Medicare patient.
The
second major concern with cutting Medicare to pay for a
massive expansion of government health insurance is that
any savings in Medicare should be used to keep the
system solvent for the coming retirement surge of baby
boomers and future generations. Medicare is funded
through a payroll tax on employers and employees;
however, the Medicare Trust Fund has an unfunded
liability of
$89 trillion. An unfunded liability
is the difference between the benefits that have been
promised to current and near retirees, and what will be
collected in dedicated taxes and Medicare premiums.
To put this in perspective, we often hear about the
crisis with Social Security. However, it carries a
significantly smaller unfunded liability of
$17.5 trillion.
When added all up,
14 percent of federal income tax
revenues are diverted to the Medicare and Social
Security trust funds to keep the systems afloat. But if
we continue down the same path, it is estimated
27 percent of federal income tax revenues would
be needed by 2020 to fully fund Medicare and Social
Security.
I hope this gives you a perspective on
the enormity of the problems facing our country and
taxpayers.
There is no question Medicare needs
to be transformed in order to be available for future
generations. But eliminating choices and access to
doctors for seniors, and using any resulting savings
(read: cuts) to pay for a massive expansion of
government health insurance, are simply not the kind of
health care reforms that will be good for the country or
citizens of Washington state.
|